On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in this, but was never able to dive in to the lengthy > discussions on this. I'm curious if there is a summary of the current > state of things somewhere that I could read to catch up. Old proposal, original implementation: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/neps/ufunc-overrides.rst Main issue for discussion: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5844. That really needs a summary, but I'm not sure there's an up-to-date one. Ralf > On Sunday, November 6, 2016, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> For those interested in continuing the __numpy_ufunc__ saga, there is a pull >>> request enabling it <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/8247>. Likely >>> we will want to make some changes up front before merging that, so some >>> discussion is in order. >>> >>> >> As a first order of business, let's decide whether to remove the index >> and rename `__numpy_ufunc__`. The motivation for this is discussed in issue >> #5986. <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5986> >> If we decide positive on that (I'm in favor), I would be happy with the >> proposed name `__array_ufunc__`, although something more descriptive like >> `__handle_ufunc__` might be better. This is a wonderful opportunity for >> bike shedding for those so inclined ;) >> >> Chuck >> >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
