On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 11:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Ruben Safir wrote: > > > > As a result, you are entirely wrong about backbones 'processing' IP ToS > > > tagged frames - no carrier that I know does respect user-set IP ToS tags > > > with regard to queueing. All IP transit is "best effort". (exceptions are > > > certain carriers offering IP-VPN, but that's beside this discussion, and > > > its not "transit" anyway). > > > > > > So, what is the bottom line about QoS in real world? It does not exist, > > > beyond given carrier's network, as specified by carrier's networking > > > staff and defined by carrier's business needs, available technologies and > > > equipment. > > > > > > This is where your mistake is. The backbone is now owned by the telcos > It isn't, really. You did not wait for the 'part 2' of my response to > explain how the internet really works, and continue to speak about > something you have no idea about. >
You didn't do any such thing other than declare that such companies have not shown any desire to do this yet. Yeah, I trust them enough to want legal protection from them. Ruben -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
