On Sun, 3 May 2015 12:02:39 +0900 DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-04-24 10:45 GMT+09:00 Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com>: > > The use of 'status' in __ocfs2_add_entry() can return wrong > > value. Some functions' return value in __ocfs2_add_entry(), > > i.e ocfs2_journal_access_di() is saved to 'status'. > > But 'status' is not used in 'bail' label for returning result > > of __ocfs2_add_entry(). > > > > So use retval instead of status. > > > > Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph...@huawei.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com> > > --- > Andrew. > > How is it going this patch, please check for me. I merged this over a week ago and it is in linux-next: http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-use-retval-instead-of-status-for-checking-error.patch You were sent a commit email at the time. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel