2015-05-03 13:13 GMT+09:00 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>: > On Sun, 3 May 2015 12:02:39 +0900 DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2015-04-24 10:45 GMT+09:00 Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com>: >> > The use of 'status' in __ocfs2_add_entry() can return wrong >> > value. Some functions' return value in __ocfs2_add_entry(), >> > i.e ocfs2_journal_access_di() is saved to 'status'. >> > But 'status' is not used in 'bail' label for returning result >> > of __ocfs2_add_entry(). >> > >> > So use retval instead of status. >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph...@huawei.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com> >> > --- >> Andrew. >> >> How is it going this patch, please check for me. > > I merged this over a week ago and it is in linux-next: > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-use-retval-instead-of-status-for-checking-error.patch > > You were sent a commit email at the time. I missed your notification mail. Sorry. I update linux-next branch and check my commit.
thanks. regards, Daeseok Youn. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
