+1 for all the commiters on the ppmc (or at least the ones who are not against being in the ppmc)
On 3/14/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me to all committers on the ppmc. > > On 3/13/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > The initial list is the set of mentors + volunteers from incubator > > > pmc. Yes, we will be expanding this list as soon as all committers get > > > their apache id's. One of the exisiting ppmc folks will start a vote > > > thread on the ppmc list to make it happen. > > > > Actually, for a podling I think that's a discussion that > > reasonably should happen on the dev list. How should the > > podling's PPMC be comprised? I don't think the PPMC should > > be determining its own composition policy. > > > > When it comes to discussing who should be granted commit, > > yes, that's a PPMC thing. However, whether PPMC should == > > committers is something for the whole podling to consider. > > I think. At least all the committers. > > - -- > > #ken P-)} > > > > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ > > Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ > > > > "Millennium hand and shrimp!" > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iQCVAwUBRBYfKprNPMCpn3XdAQJbiwP+JstO4UDlCBsNGb+M0Y0TbyjRO8g84iTN > > AmQsxt+dyijXXxaTDIXDP9HwGbgdGyk1JD6xXXcLmOZ6bSV4LS3u8KCpHHmdWUfr > > Q1n0bb0H/D6Bqhp1719ZqYT8eXcxhY8evMi4E/U88Nd2q6UUp//p6D/x59DhUldY > > L4WaB07m10s= > > =eIve > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >
