>From my experience of using both (i ended up doing an ODMG -> OTM conversion!):
Note that i dont any of the more complicated stuff - just storing object trees, collections, etc, and querying the database. Also i dont use locking atall (one thing odmg does better i believe). Go with OTM. ODMG uses ODMG queries (sql like queries for selecting objects). OTM use a criteria classes for querying. I find OTM to be simpler, but more code intensive. ODMG is slower - Ditching ODMG and moving to OTM speeded up our app by about 5x!!!!! Doing complex (nested to several degrees "a.b.c...") in OTM works - i never got it working in ODMG. Daniel. -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Francois Beaulac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 17:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Newbie Question : OTM or ODMG Hi , i'm a real OJB newbie and I wonder which API should I use, i searched the mailing list and read the entire documentation on the website (i didnt read the entire JavaDoc of course) but i wasn't able to find a great comparison between the two APIs. It would be very usefull to me if somebody could post the main differences between both APIs Thanks Jean-Francois Beaulac trainee programmer @ www.beetext.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
