I personally don't need ipadm in my LX zones, nerver missed it and I'm pretty certain I wouldn't use it even if it was available. I'd *much* prefer to have 7388 though (sorry for insisting, I couldn't resist ;-))
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Guenther Alka <a...@hfg-gmuend.de> wrote: > Setting ip properties atthe virtualisation layer > seems not straight forward to me. Lately I was > asked about the problem where DNS onUbuntu 16 > was not working despite the setting in the zone.cfg > (Configurating /etc/resolv in Linux was needed) > > I would prefer a more ESXi like behaviour where settings > about hardware like (lofi) disks, CPU, RAM, vnics are zone > settings while network configuration is done by the VM > itself with the different but regular Linux tools and ways. > > A related question > Exclusive ip access over a dedicated vnic is working. > I had problems with shared/ bridged access to a physical nic > that is in use by OmniOS itself or a different zone. Is that possible? > > And is there a property to limit RAM or CPU of an LX zone? > > Gea > > > > Am 30.03.2017 um 07:30 schrieb Johan Kragsterman: > >> Hi! >> >> >> >> -----"OmniOS-discuss" <omnios-discuss-boun...@lists.omniti.com> skrev: >> ----- >> Till: OmniOS-discuss <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> >> Från: Dan McDonald >> Sänt av: "OmniOS-discuss" >> Datum: 2017-03-30 02:12 >> Ärende: [OmniOS-discuss] LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)? >> >> One of the checkbox-items for this bloody *was* "ipadm for LX zones". >> After having some conversations with Joyent, and noticing a lack of >> enthusiasm here, I'm wondering if I should even bother with it for this >> bloody & r151022. >> >> Please speak up if you have ANY opinion on this subject. I'm honestly >> not sure, so I wouldn't be taking sides or advocating one way or the other. >> >> Thanks, >> Dan >> >> >> >> ipadm is a nice and versatile tool, and I would for sure like to see it >> in LX zones. Though the priority of the development is another question, >> WHEN to put it there. >> r151022 is an LTS release, and I believe it would be nice to have ipadm >> in there, but if you can't get it there before release, due to other >> priorities, perhaps you can backport it later? >> >> Rgrds Johan >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss >
_______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
