Roberto, On 12-10-31, at 15:14 , Roberto Galoppini <rgalopp...@geek.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 29/10/2012 Roberto Galoppini wrote: >>> >>> A more diverse and sustainable project. For example, until few years >>> ago having OOo integrated or at least able to interoperate with SAP >>> was a distinct dream, is there any chance we can have the right SAP >>> people to attend the AOO BoF, and discuss about this? >> >> >> This would be quite interesting too. I don't have any contacts, but it would >> be good to have SAP people there and, in general, devote a part of the >> session to exploring how OpenOffice can interoperate with other solutions >> (or what the OpenOffice community can do to allow others to be able to >> integrate with OpenOffice more easily), so not only the community in a >> strict sense but the ecosystem around it too. > > I have sent an email to my open source contacts at SAP, maybe other > Apache members might have contacts too. > I have my old friend from Sun, Erwin T., as well as others through him, and then some outside of open source. We've had discussions with SAP before—but that was prior-moulting, when we were still Oracles. > Having been in the OOo migrations' business for some years, I firmly > believe we should try hard to reduce the SI integration gap. Absolutely. Totally agree. Huzza. So let's. Can we perhaps formalize this in a wiki of Things That Are Important or At Least Worth It? Louis > > Roberto > >> Regards, >> Andrea. > > -- > ==== > This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It > may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the > intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately > notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any > attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. >
