2009/8/14 Shawn Boyette <sboye...@esilibrary.com>: > Dan Scott wrote: >> >> Quick note: in a recent set of commits, a number of prereqs (such as >> liblog-log4perl-perl) were added to the Evergreen Makefile.install >> file, but these are already part of the prereqs installed by the >> OpenSRF Makefile.install. >> >> This seems to run counter to the approach of "first, install OpenSRF >> (and therefore install its prereqs); then, install Evergreen (and its >> own additional prereqs)" that keeps the prereqs separate and avoids >> dual maintenance. Was this intentional (in which case, it would be >> useful to know why it is necessary), or just an oversight? > > Thanks, Dan. No, this wasn't intentional, it was me getting back into > working on osrf after a really long time, forgetting exactly how it wants to > be built, and trying to be really aggressive about catching all > dependencies. I'll get the dupes cleaned out today.
Cool, the dupes don't really hurt, but it could get messy in the long run. Thanks for that! > P.S. I don't know exactly how long it's gonna take, but you're getting your > wish for a (testing | optional sample) database at install time. Wow, awesome! Just minutes ago I wrote a separate message about that wish. You make me smile. -- Dan Scott Laurentian University