The Kerberos version is 1.6.1:

[r...@fhcore ~]# rpm -q -a | grep ^krb5
krb5-server-1.6.1-36.el5_5.5
krb5-libs-1.6.1-36.el5_5.5
krb5-workstation-1.6.1-36.el5_5.5
krb5-libs-1.6.1-36.el5_5.5

I'm staying away form the bleeding edge releases, until I've re-learned how
to make all this work with the stable ones.

My problem is that I missed the step for setting up /usr/afs/etc/krb.conf to
map the cell to the realm name.

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Derrick Brashear <sha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Phillip Moore
> <w.phillip.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My quest to refresh my AFS knowledge continues, with mixed results.
> > I can get as far as rebooting the first AFS machine, and the server and
> > client seems to come up fine, and talk to each other.  I can run any
> > administrative command as long as I use -localauth, and while I can get
> > tokens for the localcell just fine, the AFS server processes aren't
> trusting
> > them.
> > I'm using CentOS 5.4 on x86_64, using the Kerberos version which is
> packaged
> > with CentOS by default.
>
> what version? i don't think it will matter but if 1.8 there's an extra step
>
>  I've had no problem setting up my krb5 realm
> > (BOOT.EFS) and using it (my product already uses GSSAPI for basic
> > authentication).   Here's the Kerberos-related details of how this was
> > setup.
> > The AFS cell name is 'd.fh.nyc.us.boot.efs':
> > [r...@fhcore etc]# kadmin -k
> > Authenticating as principal host/fhcore.boot....@boot.efs with default
> > keytab.
> > kadmin:  add_principal -randkey -e des-cbc-crc:v4
> afs/d.fh.nyc.us.boot.efs
> > WARNING: no policy specified for afs/d.fh.nyc.us.boot....@boot.efs;
> > defaulting to no policy
> > Principal "afs/d.fh.nyc.us.boot....@boot.efs" created.
>
> that cell looks nothing like that realm.
>
> what's in FileLog? What's in /usr/afs/etc/krb.conf (or equivalent if
> you didn't use transarc paths)
>
> > How do I get the AFS server process to tell me how the credentials are
> being
> > handled?
>
> alas, currently, audit logs. but that's gonna be the issue. ptserver
> isn't mapping these to local realm user and so you are no one.
>
>
>
> --
> Derrick
>

Reply via email to