On 5/7/2014 10:44 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2014, Dave B. wrote:
> 
>> One of our main thoughts is that the version numbers should be
>> indicative of client/server compatibility.
> 
> clients and servers communicate via the AFS-3 network protocol; new
> features (RPCs) are added to that protocol in a backwards-compatible
> manner.  The expectation is that any client version should function
> usefully against any server version; I don't see there being such
> compatibility concerns.

It is not only an expectation but a requirement.   All OpenAFS releases
must be backwards compatible with not only all OpenAFS Servers but all
IBM AFS 3.6.x Servers as well.

Jeffrey Altman



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to