At 11:02 AM +1000 on 5/15/99, Adrian Sutton wrote: >> Anthony: Improper output from the CGI. Possible screwed up headers. > >These functions turn out to return under 1K of text though >whereas the others are all over 1K. Could this be a problem? Anthony: I doubt it. Ever used telnet? (BTW: Since you say it is the problem, I'm betting it indicates a larger problem... a bug somewhere) >I can send you the stack though. I'll look at it.
- OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem DeRobertis
- OODL: Questions for Anthony spierings
- OODL: Might be of interest to all spierings
- Re: OODL: Might be of interest to all DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Questions for Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Questions for Anthony spierings
- Re: OODL: Questions for Anthony M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem Adrian Sutton
- Re: OODL: Voting cgi - Problem DeRobertis