On 23-11-09 13:29, Philip Balister wrote:
On 11/23/2009 07:15 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:07 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
On 22-11-09 20:05, Martin Jansa wrote:
Every git recipe in OE tree should have some sane hash stored in
conf/distro/include/sane-srcrevs.inc
The cabal decided that checksums are "part of the metadata" and belongs
in the recipes. I don't understand why SRCREVs are so different. For
SRCREVs my life would be a lot easier if all SRCREV where put in their
respective recipes. Distros can always do
SRCREV_pn-foo = "bar"
PV_pn-foo = "1.2.3+gitr$SRCPV"
in their distro.conf if needed. Due to scoping we do need some include
for EFL_SRCREV, since those recipes are tightly tied together.
FWIW I dislike it that we have SRCREVs elsewhere. There is a problem
(bug?) with bitbake that makes this necessary though and that bug is
hard to fix :(.
The difference between checksums and SRCREV's is that there is one
checksum per file, but different distro's may use different versions of
the same software.
And that makes it not part of the metadata?
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
