Hello, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23-11-09 13:15, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> As I understand it you'll lock locking down the local build revisions >> with Angstrom anyway? > > Dunno about that, ideally the SRCPV merge should have no impact at all on > existing distros, but it looks like everyone will be forced to lock > revisions/counts down. > If there is a way to convert the database to a .inc file then we'd be a step > closer to coordinating counts between buildhosts (or rebuilds from scratch). > Currently the SRCPV looks like a major step backwards to the current > situation unless you are on a single buildhost *and* never delete TMPDIR > *and* use AUTOREV *and* care about upgrade paths. > > It would be a lot better if bitbake could just do the revlog | wc -l trick > after do_fetch has run. Or at least use that as localcount if a snapshot > exists in TMPDIR during parsing.
After looking at what SRCPV means for distro POV I fully agree with Koen. It is going to add more problems then it solves. If a distro has more then one buildhost it will be a nightmare to manage it and very error prone :-( -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
