Paul Menzel wrote:
Is there an upstream bug for this? If not, it would be great if you
could sent it upstream.
The bug is still present in upstream too, but I will send this patch to
the gsnmp maintainer if it does the trick (or should it be the other way
around?).
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 14:36 +0300 schrieb Henri Bragge:
Signed-off-by: Henri Bragge <henri.bra...@dcombus.com>
---
recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp-0.3.0/quote-fix.patch | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp-0.3.0/quote-fix.patch
diff --git a/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp-0.3.0/quote-fix.patch
b/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp-0.3.0/quote-fix.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..138c9e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp-0.3.0/quote-fix.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+diff -Nurd gsnmp-0.3.0.orig/acinclude.m4 gsnmp-0.3.0/acinclude.m4
+--- gsnmp-0.3.0.orig/acinclude.m4 2010-02-19 10:35:29.000000000 +0200
++++ gsnmp-0.3.0/acinclude.m4 2010-08-09 13:30:32.000000000 +0300
+@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
+ dnl usually in <utime.h>.
+ dnl Some systems have utime.h but don't declare the struct anywhere.
+
+-AC_DEFUN(jm_CHECK_TYPE_STRUCT_UTIMBUF,
++AC_DEFUN([jm_CHECK_TYPE_STRUCT_UTIMBUF],
+ [
+ AC_CHECK_HEADERS(utime.h)
+ AC_REQUIRE([AC_HEADER_TIME])
+diff -Nurd gsnmp-0.3.0.orig/gsnmp.m4 gsnmp-0.3.0/gsnmp.m4
+--- gsnmp-0.3.0.orig/gsnmp.m4 2010-02-19 10:35:29.000000000 +0200
++++ gsnmp-0.3.0/gsnmp.m4 2010-08-09 13:30:46.000000000 +0300
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ dnl AM_PATH_GSNMP()
+ dnl
+
+-AC_DEFUN(AM_PATH_GSNMP,
++AC_DEFUN([AM_PATH_GSNMP],
+ [
+ PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GSNMP, glib-2.0 >= 2.0.1)
+ ])
Why is this check needed? Maybe add a note to the commit message or
split the patch.
About that I've no idea, notice that I just added the brackets there.
diff --git a/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb b/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb
index b191762..6287010 100644
--- a/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb
+++ b/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv2"
DEPENDS = "glib-2.0 gnet"
PR = "r0"
I guess you need to increase `PR`.
[…]
Will do.
- Henri
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
