Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 15:05 +0300 schrieb Henri Bragge: > Paul Menzel wrote: > > Is there an upstream bug for this? If not, it would be great if you > > could sent it upstream. > > The bug is still present in upstream too, but I will send this patch to > the gsnmp maintainer if it does the trick (or should it be the other way > around?).
I have no idea [1]. But I guess it would not hurt if you send it upstream anyway. [1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Push_patches_upstream > > Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 14:36 +0300 schrieb Henri Bragge: […] > >> +diff -Nurd gsnmp-0.3.0.orig/gsnmp.m4 gsnmp-0.3.0/gsnmp.m4 > >> +--- gsnmp-0.3.0.orig/gsnmp.m4 2010-02-19 10:35:29.000000000 +0200 > >> ++++ gsnmp-0.3.0/gsnmp.m4 2010-08-09 13:30:46.000000000 +0300 > >> +@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > >> + dnl AM_PATH_GSNMP() > >> + dnl > >> + > >> +-AC_DEFUN(AM_PATH_GSNMP, > >> ++AC_DEFUN([AM_PATH_GSNMP], > >> + [ > >> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GSNMP, glib-2.0 >= 2.0.1) > >> + ]) > > > > Why is this check needed? Maybe add a note to the commit message or > > split the patch. > > About that I've no idea, notice that I just added the brackets there. Sorry, the double patch got me confused. > >> diff --git a/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb b/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb > >> index b191762..6287010 100644 > >> --- a/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb > >> +++ b/recipes/gsnmp/gsnmp_0.3.0.bb > >> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv2" > >> DEPENDS = "glib-2.0 gnet" > >> PR = "r0" > >> > > > > I guess you need to increase `PR`. > > > > […] > > Will do. Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel