On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:55, Marek Vasut via lists.openembedded.org <marex=denx...@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > I am aware of qt5 being a dead end, but I also think if making this > stuff build with scarthgap is a one-liner change, I don't really see why > not enable people to build it. > > The security implications have to be considered by the users. Maybe this > should also be spelled out in the README, for both the meta-python2 and > meta-qt5. I can send such a patch ?
Again, no. We need to draw the line somewhere, and this is where we draw it. Martin can of course still push the patch, but I'd be disappointed if he did. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#109979): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/109979 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105535514/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
