On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:56:54PM -0300, Daniel Ribeiro wrote: > 2007/10/10, Dmitry Nezhevenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > A780 and E680 ramloader isn't signed, so it's possible to patch this > > table. As far as I know, A1200 one is signer, so any kind of patching will > > break signature. > > If the loader is signed, it checks the signature on itself. > > The bootloader (MBM) does not check any signature on the ramloader > code, otherwise it would be (almost) impossible to run a kernel with > boot_usb.
Ooops. Yes.. Maybe only BP bootloader is signed. > And.. If the ramloader checks a signature on itself, it IS possible to > patch it, as long as you patch the code that does the signature > verification too. > No, It shouldn't check signature of itself. It looks stupid. -- WBR, Dmitry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
