Howard Chu wrote:
> Ryan Steele wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>> autogroup isn't supposed to perform any expansion during searches.
>>> That's not what it does.
>>>
>>
>> So, you're saying that dynlist should perform the expansion, and
>> autogroup
> just allows you to filter it?
> 
> I'm quite certain I never said any such thing.

That wasn't a statement, it was a question, denoted by the question mark 
punctuation.  And, if the answer is no, can you
elaborate on what you did mean?  Or, perhaps answer the question I asked at the 
end of the post, which was regarding how
to achieve the desired affect, as you alluded to in
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200802/msg00211.html, which 
reads:


Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Guy Deleeuw wrote:
>>  All work fine, I can retrieve the two group entries.
>>  Now, I try to retrieve the group which have a particular member
>>        (ExoMemberShipMember):
>>        ldapsearch -x -LLL -b 
>> "ou=groups,ou=portal,ou=www,ou=Exo,o=Eurofer,c=be"
>>        -s sub
>>        
>> "(&(&(objectClass=ExoMemberShip)(ExoMemberShipURL=*))(ExoMemberShipMember=cn=De
>>        Leeuw Guy,br=Internal,o=Eurofer,c=be))"
>>        And I receive an empty respond.
>>        Could you give me your advice about the feasibility of this kind of 
>> query ?
>    This occurs because you can't filter for dynamically created members, as
>    they get added to the entry while it's being returned.  So the dynamic
>    members are not present in the entry during search, when the filter is
>    evaluated.  You can only filter for static data.


You might want to look at the autogroup overlay


http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Contrib?id=5145


which will be included in OpenLDAP 2.4.8.

  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/


>
> The autogroup Readme clearly states:
> 

I have read the README.  I'm interested in the behavior mentioned in that post, 
if you could be so kind to elaborate on
the statement you made in it?

Thanks,
Ryan

Reply via email to