On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello :-) > > Simple USB JTAG adapters are not fast enough for operational analysis > of devices. The commercial ones are fast but limited in > functionalities and not extensible. The perfect solution would be to > have/create OpenOCD-BOX that would have fast and extensive GPIO with > buffers, maybe FPGA based, so it could act as JTAG/SWD/SPI/... > interface with Telnet/USB/Serial access for user commands. Having this > solution would also be a good reason to develop and make OpenOCD more > functional maybe some good way for project funding to get boards and > other stuff for developers? :-) > > Anyone know / want to design / has this solution / product? :-)
So far the replies are mostly geared toward embedded Linux solution, which may be more powerful and yet with lower cost. I do not know much with embedded Linux but I think simpler MCU based open solution can already perform quite well, eg, Simon's Versaloon. Adding a FPGA on top of MCU based solution may be easier than the embedded Linux solution and the latency may actually be better than embedded Linux. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
