On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> If we were to change the protocol, I'd want to see the new protocol
>> completely documented before and a consensus before any code was
>> accepted.
>
> I'd prefer seeing working code over documentation. Gerrit can nicely
> manage a "long-lived" commit while it is being worked on and/or
> tested.
>
> Who is using this protocol?

We can't know, but I am. It works well and has some nice design
features to it. Especially that the reply syntax is defined by the
command sent and not the implementation of the tcl server.


-- 
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to