On May 24, 2012, at 01:58 , Xiaofan Chen wrote: > I am thinking that OpenOCD codes may be able to be fixed > by following what Segger tool does. So you may want to > compare the sequences of what Segger tool does and what > OpenOCD does.
I did, but they are quite different. however we have a big advantage, while in the Segger software the configurations are fixed, in OpenOCD (almost) everything is configurable, so we don't need to recompile to accomodate some changes. >> if not, I will report this to Segger. > > I think that is a good idea anyway. ok, I did this, I'll keep you posted on the progress. regards, Liviu ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
