On 22 January 2013 15:23, CeDeROM <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think your renaming of stuff and splitting and merging commits makes > no sense at all, because you have better things to do. I have prepared > those patched carefully, introducing changes step by step. After they > are introduced, one or two commits after them code will look exactly > the same. The difference is in time of your work - you want to put > time on my patches which are clean in my opinion, or you can put time > on your HLA drivers to make work with new design. Lets move forward > :-) >
Completely agree however you have already stated your are happy with the patches as they are. Problem is i am not, and i am pretty sure none of the other OpenOCD dev's will submit the patches as they are. > >> If something else needs changing in OpenOCD, then fine lets change it >> and make the swd changes a dependant. > > When I got into the task some time ago I had two choices - clean up > the internals, or work on the swd implementation. I have chosen second > - to create platform and solution independent swd framework. Its > ready. Now I want to do the internals reorganization. If you want me > to make internals reorganization first, then for long time there will > be no swd implementation in OpenOCD and my time wil be wasted :-( > Surely if you have plans for internal restructuring then the actual transport does not matter. Cheers Spen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
