On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:02:10PM +0100, CeDeROM wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > > The use case for such a prefix is when creating a library with a > > public API, which OpenOCD is not, and will not be in foreseeable > > time. > > If I am supposed to do the work, I want it to be done correct from the > beginning. No sense for me to change some parts right now and some > parts later - do the same work two times. Changes like this were > introduced in UrJTAG and they did big good to the project :-)
Such a change needs to be talked about by the project *before* it is implemented. You can't send patches which implement such a drastic change and expect them to be accepted if those policies weren't agreed to by the project. cu Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
