Hello, another case. Every user use [PATCH] if he send a patch to the mailinglist. Why we should not use [REVIEW] for the gerrit messages?
[Openocd-development] [PATCH] cfi: unsupported code paths are now covered by asserts [Openocd-development] [REVIEW] cfi: unsupported code paths are now covered by asserts Regards, Mathias Am 28.10.2011 20:03, schrieb Mathias K.: > Hello, > > can you remove the magic incomplete number too? > > In this case the "1533d9d". This number is useless in the subject: > > [Openocd-development] openocd patch: 1533d9d cfi: unsupported code paths are > now covered by asserts > > Now we have 2 times openocd as static text left. Do you think we need it? > > > Regards, > > Mathias > > > > Am 28.10.2011 16:14, schrieb Peter Stuge: >> Jon Povey wrote: >>>> is there any chance to reduce the gerrit subject line to a >>>> normal length with more information at >>>> the beginning? Currently the subject consist of 50% static text >>>> at the beginning. >>>> >>>> [Openocd-development] New patch to review for openocd: XXXXXXX bugfixes: >>> >>> I agree. maybe one or two characters of the commit-id are all I see >>> before the subject gets chopped off on my display. >> >> I just changed it to New openocd patch: xxx >> >> >>> In fact I would get rid of [Openocd-development] too. >> >> +1 but since this is a bit more established maybe give people time to >> change their filters? Or just change it and people will change after? >> >> >> //Peter >> _______________________________________________ >> Openocd-development mailing list >> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
