Mathias K. wrote: > can you remove the magic incomplete number too? > > In this case the "1533d9d". This number is useless in the subject:
I disagree. This is an abbreviated commit hash, which identifies the commit that was pushed. There's also Gerrit's identifiers, but losing the commit hash would be impractical. > [Openocd-development] openocd patch: 1533d9d cfi: unsupported code paths are > now covered by asserts > > Now we have 2 times openocd as static text left. Do you think we > need it? My idea is obviously that we'll remove the first one. //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
