Darren J Moffat writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > I disagree. The burden placed on the overall system due to the use of > > Perl (or any other implementation choice) _is_ an architectural issue. > > Given that Perl is part of the minimal install image there doesn't seem > to be a problem here.
Another perfectly valid way to look at this is that Perl is _forced_ to be part of the minimum install image _because_ it's used for important system components. That's still architectural. > Now adding Python or other language runtime of choice into the minimal > install image would be architectural, but Perl is already there. Yes, those would have essentially the same sort of impact. As far as I know, there's no explicit policy or precedent here. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
