> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:14:31 -0400
> From: Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [osol-code] Re: [Fwd: [ksh93-integration-discuss]
ksh93-integration pre-reviewround"two" (webrev 2007-05-14)]
> To: Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roland Mainz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Kupfer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, OpenSolaris Code mailing
list <[email protected]>, Korn Shell 93 integration/migration
project discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bart Smaalders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Craig Mohrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Casper Dik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > I don't understand what the "problem" is with the way Roland has
> > implemented this? Is it a _big_ problem - or is is simply your
> > personal preference?
>
> Roger (cc'd on this email) is the right person to engage for the
> philosophical argument for it -- I am merely asking for consistency
> with the way the rest of our Makefiles work. The changes necessary
> to provide that consistency are minor and should take less than an
> hour (at most) to implement.
>
> Again, it is not about personal preference. It's about consistency and
> simplicity.
>
> --
> meem
Since I was mentioned, and at the risk of offending, the reason is this:
We want to do two things:
- Run lint over all of the lint-clean sources as part of
the nightly build, to keep those sources lint-clean.
- Be able to run lint over all of the sources, lint-clean or not,
in order to find and clean up lint-dirty sources as time permits.
The first part is achieved with $(SRC)/Makefile.lint
The second part is done by:
cd $SRC/lib ; make lint
cd $SRC/cmd ; make lint
So the next time we have a lint party (we used to do them every
couple of years), we can easily identify the lint-dirty sources.
Roger
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
