Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:59:42PM -0500, Al Hopper wrote:
>
> > Please don't ask an unpaid, volunteer, OpenSolaris developer to make 
> > changes that are simply stylistic or (personal) preference based. 
> > Consider that Sun employees are paid to make any changes their 
> > management requests - but that simply can't apply to volunteers like 
> > Roland who have already put *hundreds* of unpaid man-hours into a 
> > project.
>
> He's not asking Roland to make changes because he's his manager and
> can tell him what to work on.  The correct way to interpret this is as
> an exchange of review commentary between peer engineers.  If Roland
> doesn't want to make those changes, Meem can ask the C-team to block
> his RTI due to unsatisfied review comments.  That's not the same as
> saying that Roland has to do this or that or he's fired.

OK, if I get the right to block the RTI for the next unplanned (*) Sun tar,
I have no problem with this point of view. If this is not possible, it would 
help a lot if there was a more realistic approach.


*) Because it introduces new "inherited waste"


Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to