> > The problem is that if it is distributed under the GPLv2 there is no > > patent protection, and that is important to us. > > I've already told you once that this is a factually incorrect statement > because > (L)GPLv2 contains an implicit patent licence:
By patent protection, I mean "you lose your rights to use this if you sue" That seems to be typical use of patent protection, when talking about FOSS licenses. Sorry if I was too casual in my wording. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
