Hi,
> > so I didn't really think of using HP's compiler.
Well, using HP's compiler, I get an OpenSSL version which does
successfully pass the "make test" command...
Looks more and more like a bug in gcc-4.1
> Portable code is a chore ain't it :) It could be worse, you could be
> trying to include Windows at the same time.
It does work on Windows, Solaris, AIX and Linux already... ;-)
> I find that by compiling
> netperf with gcc, HP C, xlC, MS C etc... I find far more issues in my
> own code than in the compilers. And many of those issues are ticking
> timebombs I need to take care of anyway.
Yes, I know. Still ...
> Of course that is C, not C++, so things are rather more stable there but
> still...
Exactly.
> If you run into problems, there is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
> list that is for folks using the HP C++ compilers. C stuff gets
> discussed there too.
Thanks.
Regards,
Stefan
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
