On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:11:48AM +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
> Apache license is fine for me, while GPL could be problematic. > Incompatibility with GPLv2 is not a problem for us. > > If it is a problem for somebody - feel free to explain the details. Though I > think the decision has been made, and the majority is OK with it. I like to mention that any license change cannot be made based on a majority vote or any other method other than getting each author (or its legal representative) to *explicitly* allow the change. The method of "nothing heard equals consent" is not valid in any jurisdiction I know of. While I'm not a contributor (I think I only sent in a small diff years ago), I would like to stress that the planned relicensing procedure is not legal and can be challenged in court. -Otto -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev