Re: [openssl-dev] Work on a new RNG for OpenSSL

[Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL]

    > Pseudorandomness of the output has been a design goal/requirement only
    > in SHA-3 family. Any prior hash function’s exhibition of this property is
    > coincidental.
    > 
    > Therefore I suggest using SHA3 instead.
    
    Is pseudorandomness a requirement?  Or is it the "50% chance of a bitflip"?

For [P]RNG?! In one word: yes. 

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev