> This fact was *not* published widely enough to be seen by everyone
> concerned.  It was certainly not published as widely as the fact that SSLeay
> was created and maintained entirely outside the US, and that this was one of
> its major attractions.
> 
> Basically that internal checkin (which I have no idea what is, since I only 
> see
> the released tarballs) or any earlier US code changes would have been a
> watershed change.

Well, I can't go back to 2000 and change things.

You'll have to decide what you want to do now.
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Reply via email to