> From: openssl-users <openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org> On Behalf Of Dr Paul > Dale > Sent: Wednesday, 20 January, 2021 19:28 > > I'd suggest giving a build without the no-asm option a try. The > performance difference is usually quite significant.
I agree. It just doesn't explain what Dan's email claims. > Statis vs dynamic builds wouldn't normally be associated with such a > large difference. If the difference were routinely this large, nobody > would use dynamic linking. In this case it's the static-linked version which is slower. But I'd be surprised if that's actually the cause. -- Michael Wojcik
