On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Zhipeng Huang's message of 2018-09-14 18:51:40 -0600: > > Hi, > > > > Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm > > starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into > governance. > > It is by no means a complete solution at the moment (still have not > thought > > through the execution method yet to make sure the outcome), but feel free > > to provide your feedback at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602799/ . > > > > -- > > Zhipeng (Howard) Huang > > [I commented on the patch, but I'll also reply here for anyone not > following the review.] > > I'm glad to see the increased interest in goals. Before we change > the existing process, though, I would prefer to see engagement with > the current process. We can start by having SIGs and WGs update the > etherpad where we track goal proposals > (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals) and then we can > see if we actually need to manage goals across multiple release > cycles as a single unit. > Depending on the official outcome of this resolution, I was going to try and use the granular RBAC work to test out this process. I can still do that, or I can hold off if appropriate. > > Doug > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
