On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:19 PM, michael mccune <[email protected]> wrote:
> that's something i hadn't thought about, the process behind a list of this > sort. i don't mind having this list as a starting point, but i also agree > with Everett for the need to establish an open and transparent working > group. i'm also a big fan of the evolutionary growth model for this effort. > >> +++ > i guess this is a point we should address as well, the possibility for a > long term path towards standards. it's a tough chicken and egg type > situation, especially given the desire for openness and free growth. i'm > not sure how we would best flag that standards may someday evolve out of > the wg, or even if we need to. > I could see some guidelines becoming standards, it would be an easier process than starting from scratch since a lot of the arguments have already been had. But it is a different set of people setting those standards and I'm sure an additional round of editing would occur. But having a well-reasoned (I hope) starting point with rationale behind it is huge. dt -- Dean Troyer [email protected]
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
