I know that the change from ".." to "[1]" has been quite a sticky point for some, so I have some other proposals, let me know what you think:
The CompoundRoot object will _always_ be the foundation for the OgnlValueStack. I added a method peek() to it so that we could do: <ww:push value="counter"> <ww:push value="count"> <ww:property value="peek()"/> </ww:push> </ww:push> I had to do this because doing "." does work anymore either (I know, I know). But that got me thinking, and I can add an up() or down() (depending on how you look at it) method to CompoundRoot so that instead of "[1]" you'd have: "up()": <ww:property value="up().blah"/> <ww:property value="[1].blah"/> --- are both the same as the old --- <ww:property value="../blah"/> If Ognl is just totally unacceptable, then let's discuss two options: 1) Redevelop the WW EL with speed as well as type conversion both as a top priority 2) Develop XWork to support pluggable ValueStack implementations -Pat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
