Am 14.10.2016 um 21:51 schrieb Steffan Karger: > > On 14 Oct 2016 9:14 p.m., "Matthias Andree" <matthias.and...@gmx.de > <mailto:matthias.and...@gmx.de>> wrote: > > > > Am 14.10.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Samuli Seppänen: > > > > Would 2.3.12 -> 2.4-alpha1 be too big an upgrade? > > > > > Yes, definitely. Please create a separate distribution for .deb packages > > derived from pre-releases. > > Indeed. We shouldn't upgrade people who are expecting stable releases > to alpha versions. > One more somewhat more constructive note: Oracle have been naming their VirtualBox packages such that they included the minor version in the NAME. So the package name would be openvpn-2.3 or openvpn-2.4 for us, which creates redundancy as the actual version is added (openvpn-2.3-2.3.12), but it prevents moving users between release branches.
Alpha/beta releases and perhaps the early release candidates should still also be marked in a separate "unstable" 'distribution'.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
