On 16.06.2014 10:40, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote: >> > Hi Nikos, >> > Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way >> > to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in. >> > The main problem here is that this increase the default image size >> > significantly plus we can't even reuse all the added crypto code because >> > none of the core or important services use nettle. It would be nice to see >> > dnsmasq interacting with a more mainstream embedded crypto library like >> > polarssl or so. > On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project > under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety > of software; polarssl is closed commercial project under a commercial > license with a GPLv2 exception. >
according to https://polarssl.org/how-to-get you can use the polarssl library properly under copyleft GPL2. if they offer additional licenses does not matter. ..ede _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
