The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.

To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On 27/04/2024 00:40, st...@linux-ipv6.be wrote:
Respect the phy-is-integrated property on ethernet-phy nodes.

There are RTL8393M switches where the PHYs at address 48 and 49 are
provided by an external RTL8214FC. Hardcoding them to use the internal
SerDes makes it impossible to use the ports connected to such an
external PHY. Respect the phy-is-integrated property on ethernet-phy
nodes as a first step to support such ports.

The potential impact for this should be limited to RTL8393 based
switches, and looking at the commit messages and device tree files of
the supported switches based on this SoC, the SFP and/or combo ports are
either not working (D-Link DGS-1210-52, Netgear GS750E, TP-Link
SG2452P/T1600G-52PS), use PHYs at a different address (Panasonic
SwitchM48EG PN28480K), or already have the phy-is-integrated property
set on the PHYs at address 48 and 49.

Some time ago, Jan Hoffmann has been working on support for the HPE 1920-48G switch. He came up with a very similar patch and also with patches for the RTL8214FC. I'm using his version for quite some time now on my HPE switch.

Here is his commit: https://github.com/janh/openwrt/commit/ee5d8a17b540a3a9aa7b666a679b479903799d10

Unfortunately, there are so many different patches floating around, scattered across different forks, it's hard to know who has done what.

Andreas



--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to