-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thus Al MailingList spake: >> Hi, >> >> I don't want to be a party-pooper, but installing just another big node >> (like blutmagie) would still mean >> >> * relatively (still very low) redundancy >> >> * strong agglomeration of traffic on only a few nodes >> >> (thus leading to) >> >> * relatively simple eavesdropping of exit traffic >> >> When speaking in terms of bandwidth, e.g. 150Mbps, then I'd rather >> spread it across n machines with 150Mbps/n each. >> >> Just a thought. >> >>> Cheers, >>> David >> Timo >> *********************************************************************** >> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with >> unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ >> > > Any new nodes are great,
+1 > but it does seem like the best option might > be to get people to donate to a pool of money, from which a number of > smaller servers are paid for. +1 > Ideally also, there would be a pool of > admins, so a different person could run each node (or at least a few > nodes of the larger pool)? I'd like to mention that it'd be an ideal solution, especially to 'create trust', to have an XOR-like admin network. So, admin A is responsible for node A, admin B -> node B, etc, while nobody knows another nodes credentials. However, they of course may belong to the same family. > Al Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFL6aeGO/2mgkVVV7kRAn3qAKCs2dSpWTnSE59OSGBMgZpm3JRI1QCfWQy3 oOxyUZccTB7nQI/uxCfp17M= =4GeY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/