Err, I you don't have to be too quiet... ;-) On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:05 AM, red1 <r...@red1.org> wrote:
> ** > Ok boss.. though i am just a messenger who always get shot. > Terima kasih atas nasihat ini. Saya diam-diamlah sekarang. > > > On 7/31/12 10:41 AM, Abu Mansur wrote: > > Brother Red1, timing is everything. We will not achieve anything in random > rants you know. > > Don't spray all your bullets at random (also we need to get invited again > and again so we have more info). I am discussing with Hassan about some > possible agendas using the OSCC that we will discuss in the group here. > Just wanted to get some structure otherwise the con/skype call will be > messy. In Sales we have a saying (you are selling something), sales is a > process, when it is not a process, then it is a problem. We need to map an > action plan with doable milestones. Hope SIG members can take up components > of the tasks ahead so it doesn't end up on one person, sort of like a > gotong royong thing... > > Some of my agenda that I have discussed with some of you:- > > The Open Development Model in Government Procurement for software ie > projects evolve with OSS license and development process from the very > beginning. When actual tender comes out, marks will be given to based on > Vendors participation for initial phase. Winning vendor becomes major > project sponsor. Recruitment by vendor for developers is also easier as you > can see who are the main developers contributing to the project. Less > possibilities of lemons (Eg Kastam GST like last time) > > The other one is software development on top of SELINUX for government > software (I am presenting to govt CIO this coming 10th) to move to more > serious stuff in OSS. If we can tie in with activity one of the above and > incorporate academic faculty members and students in the development we can > kill two, nay even three birds with one stone. The government can really be > a catalyst for our software industry by providing a fertile ground for some > serious software development through these projects. > > More thoughts later (everyone else feel free to rant here) as I am rushing > to send my first draft to MAMPU... > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Redhuan <r...@adempiere.org> wrote: > >> I think we should brainstorm more often together (while blasting away on >> four pistons) as i do not think our pitch yesterday sinks in or far. It is >> better we make a proper presentation as a powerful think tank collectively, >> to the right office such as KSU and then PM, and collect momentos of 'skull >> tatoos' along the way. >> I like to share what a friend working somewhere up in KLCC Towers who >> wrote to me a moment ago: >> >> Nor Bahgia B M Nordin: >> "I think anything creative futuristic or game changing breakthrough >> spearheaded by government servants will fail due to their multiple KPI >> mentality, and other restrictions. >> >> Entreprenurs/Technopreneurs/Scientist have a ‘no-choice’ ‘do-or-die’ >> situation, which drives them to do the impossible. It’s a intense single >> minded focus. >> >> Jobs, Gates, Page and the rest never wasted their time with the >> government types. They just went ahead and did what they were supposed to >> do regardless. >> I can tell you this. The road-maps will just collect dust again." >> >> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from and detail about this group > http://portal.mosc.my/osdc-my-mailing-list-information > > OSDC.my Discussion Group In Facebook > http://www.facebook.com/groups/osdcmalaysia/ > > Malaysia Open Source Conference 2012 > MOSC2012 http://portal.mosc.my/ > -- Abu Mansur http://amansur.blogspot.com <man...@persis.biz> -- To unsubscribe from and detail about this group http://portal.mosc.my/osdc-my-mailing-list-information OSDC.my Discussion Group In Facebook http://www.facebook.com/groups/osdcmalaysia/ Malaysia Open Source Conference 2012 MOSC2012 http://portal.mosc.my/
