The code in Optimizer.cpp makes this look like a bug. If the two were intended to be synonymous, I'd expect they would share the same code. They don't. I'm betting FLATTEN_STATIC_TRANSFORMS_DUPLICATING_SHARED_SUBGRAPHS is supposed to be 0x10000. -Paul
_____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Martz Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 2:57 PM To: 'OpenSceneGraph Users' Subject: Re: [osg-users] Optimizer options oddity Hi Glenn - I haven't looked at the code, but I see this in the ChangeLog: 2008-06-20 13:16 +0000 [r8474] robert: * From Terry Welsh, new flatten static transforms visitor that duplicates subgraphs that are shared beneath differnt static transforms From Robert Osfield, made a range of changes to Terry's visitor integrating it into osgUtil::Optimizer and changing the code to use a style more like the rest of the OSG. Maybe Terry can shed some light on this, or you could search osg-users for the week leading up to this change to see if anything was said about it. Or we can put this on a list of things for Robert to check before tagging 2.6. -Paul _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Waldron Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:48 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: [osg-users] Optimizer options oddity I noticed that two of the OptimizerOptions values, COPY_SHARED_NODES and FLATTEN_STATIC_TRANSFORMS_DUPLICATING_SHARED_SUBGRAPHS, have the same enum value (0x100). Is this intentional? This is in 2.6 RC1. Glenn -- Glenn Waldron : Pelican Mapping : http://pelicanmapping.com : +1.703.652.4791
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
