Whitewash.  

"Lack of imagination."
 
Bruce
 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4861528.stm
Last Updated: Thursday, 30 March 2006, 15:07 GMT 16:07 UK
<http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif> 

 

Intelligence lessons of 7/7 

 
<http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39406000/jpg/_39406264_frank_gardner_
by58x55.jpg> 
          <http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif>   
By Frank Gardner 
BBC security correspondent 
  <http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/999999.gif> 


A cross-party committee of MPs investigating the intelligence failure to
stop the London bombings of July 2005 has blamed it on a lack of resources,
rather than on any error of judgement. 




 Bombed bus in Tavistock Square
<http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41504000/jpg/_41504064_buspa203ok.jpg
> 
MPs say the public should be better informed of terrorist threats
For the past few months the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security
Committee, the ISC, has been interviewing members of the police and
intelligence agencies to establish what information they had on the
terrorist threat to Britain and how they acted on it prior to 7 July. 

The committee's report, which is being handed to the prime minister's office
and which will likely be published at the end of April, essentially
addresses the question - could more have been done to stop the bombers
getting through? 


The conclusion is that while there was clearly a failure of intelligence, no
single agency or individual was to blame, given the resources they had. 


Not investigated 


The committee has questioned why Mohammad Sidique Khan, the lead bomber who
killed six people when he blew himself up at Edgware Road Tube station on 7
July, was known to the intelligence services before July but not fully
investigated. 


The MPs have accepted the official explanation that Khan was suspected of
petty fraud not terrorism, so he was not considered a high priority. 



  <http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif>   
  <http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif> It will
take years before new [intelligence] recruits are vetted and trained - time
which would-be terrorists are expected to exploit
<http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif> 

Whitehall officials have admitted that they had eavesdropped on telephone
conversations made by Khan but that he was not the focus of their
investigation, which was centred on an imminent terrorist plot involving
others. 

They say no intelligence came to light to suggest Khan was plotting an
attack. 


But intelligence expert Professor Anthony Glees of Brunel University
believes MI5, the security service, should have done more. 


He told BBC News: "The security service understands that it is the body that
is charged with having good predictive intelligence and what the London
attacks show is that there was no good predictive intelligence. 


"They didn't look carefully enough at the sort of people who might be
tempted into becoming terrorists." 


Informing public 


The ISC committee has made a number of criticisms. 


Its members are concerned that intelligence-gathering on British militants
travelling to Pakistan was not as good as it should have been. 


Khan and other members of his cell are thought to have linked up there with
extremist radicals, possibly al-Qaeda recruiters. 


However, the committee believes it was only after the London bombings that
British investigators got full co-operation from their counterparts in
Pakistani intelligence. 


Another criticism made by the ISC committee is over the complexity, secrecy
and ineffectiveness of the present system of threat levels and alert states.



These are raised and lowered in secret according to an intricate sliding
scale of terrorist threats. 


The ISC believes the system needs to be simplified and the public kept
better informed. 


'Unprecedented' threat 


Whitehall officials have told the BBC they are now facing an unprecedented
number of terrorist plots in Britain. 


They say the threat of home-grown terrorism has increased substantially
since the Iraq invasion of 2003, and that 50% of recent disrupted plots are
home-grown, involving British nationals living in Britain. 


Whitehall officials have also said that in practice, counter-terrorism in
this age means stopping most but not necessarily all attacks. 


The intelligence services are currently undergoing a major expansion with
the aim of doubling in size to around 3,000 members each, but it will take
years before new recruits are vetted and trained - time which would-be
terrorists are expected to exploit. 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to