NBC: Attack that killed kids targeted al-Qaida leader

Officials: Military knew children were present but considered risk worth it

By By Jim Miklaszewski, Courtney Kube and Robert Windrem

Updated: 9:12 p.m. ET June 19, 2007

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19318805/

 

U.S. special operations forces were targeting the leader of al-Qaida in
Afghanistan - one of the organization's top commanders - when they launched
an attack against a compound that killed seven children Sunday in Paktika
province of eastern Afghanistan, U.S. officials tell NBC News.

 

According to several officials, and contrary to previous statements, the
U.S. military knew there were children at the compound but considered the
target of such high value it was worth the risk of potential collateral
damage.

 

Those same officials tell NBC News the target of Sunday's attack was Abu
Laith al Libi, the al-Qaida commander in Afghanistan and a top lieutenant of
Osama bin Laden.  The sources report that although six sets of remains
besides those of the seven children were recovered, it's not clear whether
Abu Laith is among those killed.

 

Abu Laith, a physically imposing 40-year-old Libyan, is an outspoken leader
of al-Qaida, appearing in videos and on the Internet. An October 2006
Defense Intelligence Agency analysis describes him this way: "Speaks Arabic
with a Maghreb/Moroccan dialect; scars on back as if beaten by a belt or
wire; senior Al Qaeda commander; expert in guerrilla warfare."

 

Abu Laith is also believed to wear a dental bridge that could help in
identifying him.

 

Visible leader

It was he in July 2002 who revealed that bin Laden was still alive, the
first comments about the al-Qaida leader's health after the end of the
Afghan conflict. Then, in June 2004, he was shown leading an attack on what
appears to be an Afghan military outpost and calling for jihad while
praising both the Taliban and bin Laden. He is known to operate on the
Afghan side of the border, working with the remnants of the Taliban.

 

In some U.S. intelligence analyses, he is viewed as one of the
organization's top commanders, ranking in the top five.

 

Military officials say special operations forces relied on a relatively new
weapons system to carry out the attack - High Mobility Artillery Rockets, or
HIMARS.  The rockets are fired high into the atmosphere from launchers on
the ground.  Then, on the way down, they are guided to the target by either
GPS or lasers.  The officials say as many of five of these HIMARS were used
in the attack on the compound.  It was the same weapons system used recently
in the killing of Mullah Dadullah, the Taliban's military commander.  The
rockets are now used as a complement to the Predator drones that have killed
more than a dozen al-Qaida leaders since Sept 11, 2001.

 

Initial reports had U.S. jets targeting a compound that also contained a
mosque and a madrassa, or Islamic school.

 

A coalition statement following the attack said "nefarious activity was
occurring at the site" without describing either the activity or the level
of al-Qaida present. Army Maj. Chris Belcher, a coalition spokesman, accused
al-Qaida of using "the protective status of a mosque, as well as innocent
civilians, to shield themselves."

 

Early reports indicated seven children at the madrassa and "several
militants" were killed, and two militants detained, the statement said.

 

"We are saddened by the innocent lives that were lost as a result of
militants' cowardice," Belcher said Monday.  But Belcher also contended
coalition troops had "surveillance on the compound all day and saw no
indications there were children inside the building."

 

He accused the militants of not letting the children leave the compound.

 

"If we knew that there were children inside the building, there was no way
that that airstrike would have occurred," said Sgt. 1st Class Dean Welch,
another coalition spokesman.

 

But Tuesday, other U.S. officials confirmed that U.S. forces were indeed
aware of the children's presence. Military officials told NBC News the
al-Qaida leader was considered such a high-value target it was worth the
risk that some children might become casualties of the attack.

 

Past attacks scrubbed because of civilian presence

The U.S. has in the past called off attacks on al-Qaida hideouts because of
the presence of civilians, including family members of high-value targets.

 

The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan said it has sent a team with the
Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission to investigate the incident.

 

Col. Jack Jacobs, a Medal of Honor winner and NBC News analyst, said that
decisions to go ahead with an attack when civilians are believed present are
among the most agonizing military commanders have to make.

 

"As a military officer, it is difficult to talk about the calculation
involved, weighing the independent variables, whether it's saving your
country or achieving your objectives, while acknowledging that it requires
the taking of innocent lives.

 

"It's what still haunts the military from World War II, when 70,000 or
100,000 civilians were killed because people thought it would end the war
sooner."

 

Roger Cressey, former deputy director of counterterrorism at the National
Security Council and another NBC News analyst, said killing Abu Laith would
be a major strategic victory, adding to "serious leadership losses al-Qaida
and the Taliban have suffered recently."

 

"In the aggregate, this will impact their ability to maintain command and
control and eliminate experienced battlefield leadership," Cressey said.

 

C 2007 MSNBC Interactive

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19318805/

 

  
FAIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976.  "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.  For more information go
to:  <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml>
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED  MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION
IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to