"Part of Iran's goal is to get Turkey to carry its political water in
Washington. Iran's leaders hope Mr. Erdogan will convince the State
Department and the White House to accept the Iranian fable that PJAK is
merely the "Iranian branch" of the PKK."


 
<http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071105/COMMENTARY/1
11050009>
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071105/COMMENTARY/11
1050009
Commentary
Border turmoil tripwires
Kenneth R. Timmerman, Washington Times,  5 November, 2007


As Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan visits Washington today, he
will ask President Bush for approval to launch military action against
Kurdish rebels based in Northern Iraq.

He will use all the arguments that Washington likes to hear. Turkey is an
ally in the war on terror, the PKK is a terrorist group, therefore
Washington should agree to Ankara's request to smash them. Simple, no?

In fact, the situation in northern Iraq is far from simple. For starters, a
Turkish invasion of northern Iraq will destabilize a peaceful, prosperous,
and pro-American region of Iraq.

Already Iraqi Kurds  are fleeing the border zones. If the 60,000 Turkish
troops now amassed at the border  cross into Iraq, they will provoke a
massive new refugee crisis and destroy the boom economy  that has made the
Kurdish region "the other Iraq," an Iraq of entrepreneurs, safety and
civility.

Even worse:  A Turkish invasion of northern Iraq will directly benefit
another key regional player, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Little known in Washington is the strategic and military alliance forged
recently between U.S. NATO ally Turkey  and U.S. arch-enemy Iran.

Since August,  Iran and Turkey have jointly battled Kurdish rebel groups
based in Northern Iraq. When the cross-border shelling of Iraqi villages
began Aug. 16, Turkish gunners opened fire against PKK bases  along Iraq's
border with Turkey, while Iranian gunners simultaneously took aim at
guerrillas  of the Party of Free Life of Iranian Kurdistan, commonly known
as PJAK.

I recently returned from a reporting trip to Northern Iraq,  where I spent
several days at PJAK rebel bases deep in the Qandil Mountains along the
Iraqi border with Iran.

The first thing that became immediately clear was the geography.
The PKK and PJAK occupy completely different areas of northern Iraq,
separated from each other by 11,000-foot mountain peaks and breathtaking
canyons.

The PKK faces north,  toward Turkey, and directs its activities against
Turkey. PJAK faces east, toward Iran, and since 2004 has been conducting
political and guerrilla operations inside Iranian Kurdish areas. In the two
months since the recent fighting began,  PJAK guerrillas told me they have
killed 200 Iranian Revolutionary Guards troops in 21 separate clashes,  most
of them provoked by the Iranian side.

In the PJAK bases I visited,  there was not only no PKK presence: There was
no hint of political, military or strategic cooperation between the two
groups.

PJAK seeks to democratize Iran  through a broad-based political struggle,
backed by "self-defense forces" whose purpose is to deter repressive actions
by the Revolutionary Guards and other security forces. They do not seek a
military confrontation with the regime, nor are they asking for U.S.
military assistance.

PJAK has no involvement and, indeed, does not endorse the actions against
Turkey by the HPG self-defense forces,  commonly (and erroneously) known  as
the PKK.

Part of Iran's goal  is to get Turkey  to carry its political water in
Washington. Iran's leaders hope Mr. Erdogan  will convince the State
Department and the White House to accept the Iranian fable  that PJAK is
merely the "Iranian branch" of the PKK.

This is a convenient lie, and a deadly one. If there is any covert
cooperation, it is between Iran and Turkey. Turkish military officers are
today stationed at Revolutionary Guards headquarters in Urmieh and in other
Iranian cities close to northern Iraq, where they advise Iranian troops in
counterinsurgency methods.

Were PJAK expelled from the border area, Iran would open a new infiltration
route to supply insurgents with arms, money and
Explosively-Formed-Penetrators (EFPs) for use against coalition forces and
our Iraqi allies. Without PJAK control of that border, Erbil and
Suleymaniyah  would resemble the Fallujah and Ramadi  of early 2006.

This is indeed Iran's goal.  In our eagerness to help nations battling
terrorist groups, we should not fall into this deadly Iranian government
trap.

And yet, the CIA and the State Department appear more eager to talk to the
Iranian regime than they are to talk with PJAK, whose president, Rahman Haj
Ahmadi, they refused to meet during a recent trip to Washington this summer.

The United States should be helping PJAK, which has made clear its
willingness to work with other pro-democracy groups in Iran to forge a broad
alliance to oppose the ruling clerics in Iran. Supporting such an alliance
is our best hope - and probably our only hope - for avoiding war.


Kenneth R. Timmerman is a contributing editor to Newsmax.com. His latest
book, "Shadow Warriors," will be released by Crown Forum tomorrow.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to