On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: >> * The alpm_rmrf function is available from the frontend, which does >> the same >> as this function did. >> >> * It was worth to modify _alpm_rmrf to alpm_rmrf for pacman frontend >> to be >> able to use it in the future or for other frontend, so the function >> declaration was moved into the api header file, named alpm.h, and the >> definition of this function got a SYMEXPORT attribute. >> >> * The rmrf funtion calling was changed in ./src/pacman/sync.c for >> alpm_rmrf >> >> * The _alpm_rmrf functions were changed in api for alpm_rmrf >> > > Why would we do that ? alpm is not a general system utility. > > Besides this function is not as safe as it could be. > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16363
I agree with Xavier here; especially knowing the function isn't perfect it doesn't make sense to expose it and then have to debug people's issues with it when they use it in ways we did not intend (which is to remove database directory hierarchies only, etc.). Wow, that was a rambling sentence. Sorry. :) -Dan
