Laszlo Papp wrote:
* The alpm_rmrf function is available from the api, which does the
same as this function did, with a small sanity check.
* It was worth to establish alpm_rmrf for _alpm_rmrf for pacman frontend
as a wrapper to be able to use it in the future or for other frontend, so the
function declaration was deleted in the frontend, and the new alpm_rmrf
wrapper function was established for future usage with SYMEXPORT modifier.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp <[email protected]>
---
What about this approach ?
What is different and how does this address the comments Xavier and Dan
made earlier?
Allan
