In addition to in-built stereo microphones, the other nicer feature of the
DM-550 over the DS-71 is that wav recordings can be split or truncated.
This
would allow a narrator to record a book, and cut out recording stumbles
etc,
and then resume narration in the next file. That is, it doesn't support
true
over-write recording, but unlike the DS series unwanted audio can be
deleted
on the machine itself.
Unlike the DS range, The DM-550 also supports 999 instead of 99 files in
each of the five sound recording folders.
I believe it would be an absolutely fantastic and incredibly portable
recorder for on-site interviews and podcast recordings.
Size wise I estimate it is less than a 5th of the overall size of the
pocket.
I have minimally used a Plextalk Pocket, and with external mics it is
pretty
good quality, but I don't know the quality of the pocket's internal
microphone, but suspect it is relatively crappy. Certainly it was awful in
the Plextalk PTR 2!
I can't find any disadvantages at all of the DM-550 over the DS-71, which
is
great! And, as previously mentioned, I suspect its recording quality is a
significant step above that of the DS-71.
In short, I want one :-)
Tim Noonan
-----
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Ray
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:09 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: RE: Olympus DM520
Useful information and thoughts on the Olympus recorders there Tim, so
thanks.
My interest in these recorders is as a relatively affordable portable
recorder
for blind people doing audio journalism-type recordings for talking
newspapers
and audio magazines. There is sufficient voice guidance now to make this
a
far more reliable and practical job than with much less accessible
recorders.
the Plextor may come into it's own where a bit more dynamic range is
needed
and some music of limited dynamic range could be recorded too with it.
That leaves us with recorders of the calibre of the Sony PMCD50 - hope
I've
got it's model number right - for live music and high quality sound
gathering.
While it's not really "accessible" we're told by Neal Ewers it is usable.
that would seem to me to be the main choices open to us just now. Others
could add in the Edirol R09h and the new Zoom recorder and there are
podcasts
kicking about covering these too. Let's hope someone reviews the Olympus
DM
series soon.
Ray
Tim Noonan wrote:
Going from the functionality in the Olympus DS71, which has adjustable
recording levels, there are either 10, but probably 15 recording volume
settings, accessed by pressing the left and right arrows while in record
pause or record. In addition, there are still the three microphone
sensitivity settings on the side of the machine. The volume limiter (anti
clipping facility is disabled when recording is set to manual volume
levels.
I haven't tested extensively, but while I think the voice capture of the
DS-71 is extraordinarily good, for full spectrum recording, there is a lot
more background hiss during silent passages and it seems somewhat limited
frequency response, than one would expect for a wave recorder.
I deduce from the promotional material, that the DM-550 will be a
reasonable
step up in actual recording quality, above and beyond the quality of the
DS-71.
That all said, for recording meetings and small conferences, the clarity
of
voice recordings and memos is second to none on the DS71, and its
fantastic
form-factor, in-built speaker and battery life.
I'm not convinced the DM-550's recording quality will equal the Plextalk
Pocket, and am certain it will be nowhere near the Zoom and Edirol units.
Disclaimer, this email is in part based on my direct experience and a few
educated guesses.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Ray
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:11 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Olympus DM520
Rick, It seems the DM550, a bit more exspensive than the 520, has
adjustable
recording level. Quite what this means I'm not sure, i.e. it could be in
three or four sensitivity settings, or a continuous control, but not seen
the
recorder so don't know.
Worth re-reiterating the Plextor Pocket has meters so you can actually
monitor
record level; doubt the Olypus DM550 can do that, but then no doubt you'd
get
acustomed to using it.
Ray
Rick Alfaro wrote:
This seems really impressive for the price and actually capable of
making some high end recordings. I wonder however if there is a way of
turning off AGC and setting recording levels manually? There is no
mention of this.
On 10/11/2009 4:39 PM, Ray wrote:
A lot of info here about the Olympus DM 520:
http://www.videodirect.com/olympus/voicerecorders/olympus-dm-520.html
Seems to have .mp3 recording, a micro SD card slot and voice guidance.
Ray
Dave McElroy WA6BEF wrote:
Anybody have any information on this one? Any specs? Is recording
quality
better than its predicessors? Can't seem to find any good data.
Thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
--
--Regards,
Rick Alfaro
rick.alf...@gmail.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
